Understanding the difference between RSO and FECO

FECO vs. RSO: Unraveling the Distinctions Between Full Extract Cannabis Oil and Rick Simpson Oil

Introduction

In the realm of cannabis concentrates, Full Extract Cannabis Oil (FECO) and Rick Simpson Oil (RSO) are two widely discussed extracts, each with its unique properties and potential medicinal benefits. While both are derived from the Cannabis sativa plant, they differ in their extraction methods, composition, and historical origins. This essay aims to delve into the dissimilarities between FECO and RSO, shedding light on their respective production processes, cannabinoid profiles, and therapeutic potential.

The Origins of RSO

Rick Simpson Oil, or RSO, owes its name to Rick Simpson, a Canadian medical marijuana activist who popularized its use for medicinal purposes. In 2003, Simpson claimed to have cured his skin cancer using a homemade cannabis oil, which he later named “Rick Simpson Oil.” His story gained widespread attention, leading to a surge in interest in RSO as a potential alternative treatment for various medical conditions, including cancer.

RSO Extraction Process

The extraction process for RSO is relatively simple and can be performed at home using commonly available materials. It involves soaking dried cannabis plant material in a solvent, typically isopropyl for an extended period. The solvent dissolves the cannabinoids and other compounds present in the plant, creating a concentrated cannabis oil. The mixture is then strained, and the solvent is evaporated, leaving behind a thick, dark oil that is rich in cannabinoids.

It is important to note that the RSO extraction method does not involve precise temperature control or preservation of volatile compounds like terpenes, which can impact the final product’s aroma and flavor.

The Evolution of FECO

Full Extract Cannabis Oil, or FECO, has evolved as a refinement of the original RSO concept. While the basic extraction principles remain similar, FECO places greater emphasis on preserving the plant’s natural compounds, including cannabinoids and terpenes.

FECO Extraction Process

The FECO extraction process begins with completely dry cannabis plant material. The plant material is placed into a jar and frozen at sub freezing temperatures to aid in the removal of fats, lipids, and waxes. Once the materials and food grade ethanol is frozen to temperature it is combined and aggitated over a period of time until all of the desirable trichomes are removed. Then the material and alcohol is separated and then filtered using a Buchner Funnel and vacuum. We can then take that wash and run it safely using a closed loop system that will separate the alcohol and leave the full extract cannabis oil behind.

The hydrocarbon extraction method used in FECO production is more efficient at capturing a broader range of cannabinoids and terpenes compared to the simple solvent soak method employed in RSO production. The resulting FECO typically contains higher levels of THC and a more diverse terpene profile, offering a richer and potentially more therapeutic cannabis experience.

Cannabinoid Profiles

One of the significant differences between FECO and RSO lies in their cannabinoid profiles. Both extracts contain a mix of cannabinoids, but the ratios and concentrations differ due to their respective extraction methods.

RSO is known for its high THC content, making it a potent extract with psychoactive effects. The solvent soak method may not fully preserve the plant’s natural cannabinoid profile, leading to a higher concentration of THC relative to other cannabinoids like CBD or CBG.

In contrast, FECO often exhibits a more balanced cannabinoid profile. The hydrocarbon extraction method used in FECO production allows for a more comprehensive capture of cannabinoids, including CBD and other minor cannabinoids. This balanced profile, combined with higher levels of terpenes, may contribute to the entourage effect, where the cannabinoids and terpenes work together synergistically to enhance the overall therapeutic benefits.

Therapeutic Potential

Both FECO and RSO have been associated with potential medicinal benefits, primarily attributed to their cannabinoid content. THC, the primary psychoactive cannabinoid in cannabis, has been studied for its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antiemetic properties, among others. Some individuals have reported finding relief from chronic pain, nausea, and other symptoms using RSO.

CBD, another essential cannabinoid, has gained significant attention for its potential anti-inflammatory, anxiolytic, and anticonvulsant effects. In FECO, the balanced cannabinoid profile may provide a broader range of potential therapeutic benefits compared to RSO’s predominantly THC-focused profile.

It is important to note that while there is a growing body of anecdotal evidence supporting the use of FECO and RSO for various conditions, scientific research on their efficacy is still limited. Controlled clinical trials are necessary to validate their potential as medical treatments and to establish appropriate dosing guidelines and safety profiles.

Conclusion

In summary, Full Extract Cannabis Oil (FECO) and Rick Simpson Oil (RSO) are two distinct cannabis concentrates with varying extraction processes, cannabinoid profiles, and potential therapeutic benefits. RSO, with its simple solvent soak extraction, tends to have a higher concentration of THC and may be more popular among individuals seeking potent psychoactive effects. On the other hand, FECO, with its hydrocarbon extraction method, offers a more balanced cannabinoid profile and higher levels of terpenes, potentially providing a broader range of therapeutic benefits.

As the cannabis industry continues to evolve, both FECO and RSO will likely remain relevant in the realm of medicinal cannabis. As more research is conducted on their therapeutic potential, consumers and medical professionals will gain a deeper understanding of their benefits and limitations, allowing for more informed choices in selecting the most suitable cannabis extract for specific medical needs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *